Category Archives: Assessment

Showing Some Love for the OG NAEP

It’s common knowledge that for technical and practical reasons I’m not a big fan of preserving NAEP trends. I’m a little suspect of trying to stretch test scales across decades back to the 1990s, let alone back to the 1970s. That being said, I’m also one who respects history and lineage. And as we emerge from Father’s Day weekend, it’s appropriate to take a little time to pay homage to the “father” of the current NAEP assessment and those who championed its cause. I think that it’s safe to say that without the solid foundation laid by the NAEP Long Term Trend assessment, the Main NAEP with its state-level results wouldn’t have gotten off the ground in the 1990s. 

Ten Numbers That Shook My World

We all have them. The images that we can never unsee. The quote, song lyric, or perhaps poem that we never forget. That friend, colleague, or chance interaction that had a profound impact on us. Having spent my life immersed in data, I guess that it makes sense that I also have a list of ten numbers or statistics that shook my professional world. I discuss those numbers in today’s “very special” blog post. That is, it’s way too long, but like Netflix, I give you the option to binge this as a naughty summer reading treat or to break up the 10 self-contained “episodes” on your own.

Assessment ________ Learning

The relationship between assessment and learning is one that we’ve been struggling to understand for as long as I can remember. Before we jump headlong into reimagining assessment, it will be beneficial to clarify what we mean by both terms as well as the relationship(s) between them. 

Let’s begin with a simple filling in the blank item:  Assessment ______ Learning.

The Tale Of The Tape

All signs suggest that we might finally be emerging from our decade-long period of malaise regarding large-scale testing. Advances in AI, flexibility from the feds, and new buckets of money are making people giddy. Happy Days Are Here Again! In such heady times, however, it’s critical that we step back and take a sober look at our place in the education world.

To Those Burrs In Our Saddle

I truly enjoyed reading the many posts describing the amazing work showcased at NCME in LA; and the positive, uplifting experience that the conference was for everyone. But in this week’s post I want to acknowledge the contribution of those who take it upon themselves to poke, prod, and noodge at every presentation and in response to every post.  It takes a village and they are part of ours.

On Scales, Achievement Standards, and Trends

A bonus blog post in honor of #NCME2026 conference week. Last month I tugged on Superman’s cape when I suggested that preserving the NAEP trend might not be in our best interest. Today, I refresh a presentation from the early days of the CCSS, PARCC, and Smarter Balanced to clarify that reporting a NAEP trend is not the problem. Rather, the problem may be in the way that we in educational measurement and assessment tie trends to fixed achievement standards and scales.

The Significance* of NAEP

I wrap up my March series, NAEP by the Numbers, with the number .05 and a discussion of significance and differences. The significance of NAEP lies far beyond score differences within and across years that are statistically significant at the .05 level. Much of what makes NAEP significant is that it is different. Different from state tests. Different from tests administered by schools and districts. It serves a different purpose. A purpose for which it is well-designed. Simply put, NAEP is NAEP.

Batting .500 with the NAEP Scale

In the second post of my NAEP by the Numbers series, I reflect on the NAEP 0-500 scales: both the Long Term Trend scale that stretches back to the 1970s and the new scale developed when NAEP began reporting state results some 35 years ago. At times, impressive. Other times frustrating. Love it or hate it, there’s nothing in our field quite like the NAEP scale.